This ruling has seen some controversy, though most Malaysian netizens seem to have taken it as is.
Sabahan law now requires individuals under the age of 18 to produce some sort of proof that their parents allow them to embrace Islam as their religion of choice.
The Community and Consumer Rights Development Minister of Sabah, Jainab Ahmad, has confirmed that the move was made to be in line with the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.
She has stated that the amendments to the Law Reformation Bill (Marriage & Divorce) (Amended) 2016 has made it so that in the event of a divorce, the original religion of the child will be maintained.
This will make it so that if the new custodian of a child is of a different religion, even Islam, the custodian has no right to convert the child.
The new amendment further states that if either parent of a child were to convert to Islam, the child would have the right to remain in his or her original religion, unless he or she chooses not to.
Which sounds rather reasonable, don’t you think?
Now if the child is above the age of 18, there would be no contest as he is considered a fully-fledged adult. He can convert to whichever religion he so wishes.
But if the child is below the age of 18, this new amendment would make it so that it would require both his birth parents to sign a consent form to allow this.
This is made to prevent one parent from forcibly converting his child after a divorce.
The minister, Jainab Ahmad, further yearned that Sabah will not allow a minor to be converted with just the consent of one parent.
This move is seen in direct contest to the recent ruling in Perlis that allows one parent to convert their child provided that the religion in question is Islam.
The move, which amended the Islamic Administration Enactment of Perlis (2006) to say “mother or father or guardian” as opposed to “parents or guardian” to approve a minor’s change in religion.
The move in Perlis has seen tremendous backlash, with many citing Article 4 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia as directly clashing with the ruling.
Normally, this would mean that the ruling would be invalidated, but we have yet to hear on any Federal Court cases pertaining to this.
What do you guys think? Should minors be given a right to choose or should the decision of the parents take precedence in matters like this?
Govt: Misleading Ads Are Prohibited, Action Can Be Taken Against Advertisers
Have you ever saw a food ad, got tempted by it how awesome it looks, went to buy the food...
Malaysian Couple Who Rescues Injured Animals Seeks To Get Rid Of Social Stigma Surrounding Dogs
For the past eight years, 28-year-old Nurul Ain Abdul Hamid and her husband, Muhammad Razeef Che Samah, have been rescuing...
Malaysian Exposed By UK Tabloid For Intl Human Organ Trading Arrested in Kuching
The man who was recently exposed by The Sun in the UK for illegally selling human organs in the international...
Limit on Hiring Foreign Workers In Malaysia To Be Lifted, But Local Workers Should Be Prioritised
On 29 July, it was made official that foreign workers are limited to working in only three sectors which are...
“I Thought It Was A Doll!” Shocked Passerby Finds Body Of Baby With Umbilical Cord Still Intact In Sabah
Disclaimer: Graphic images, viewer discretion is advised. The body of a poor little baby boy was found after he was...
- Current Affairs23 hours ago
4-year-old Kedah Girl Dies After Father Forgets and Leaves Her In The Car For 10 Hours
- News23 hours ago
M’sian Reveals How He Got Kicked Out Of Rented Subang Unit Once Owner Found Out He Was Indian
- News19 hours ago
Woman Denied Entrance Into Kuala Lumpur Library For Wearing A “Revealing Blouse”
- Current Affairs20 hours ago
Pharmaceutical Company, Pfizer, Is Reported To Have Successfully Produced A Vaccine for Covid-19