The court’s decision to fine Royal Police escort Muhammad Taufik Ismail RM1,000 for injuring an e-hailing driver has sparked outrage among the public and the Deaf community.
The Deaf Advocacy and Well-Being National Organisation (DAWN) expresses disappointment and concern over the outcome of the case involving the assault of Ong Ing Keong, a Deaf driver who was assaulted in front of a Kuala Lumpur hotel on May 28.
For illustration purposes only
DAWN and the Deaf community demand transparency
In a statement released by DAWN, they described how Ong had endured months of fear and psychological distress, uncertain if he could rely on those entrusted with upholding the law for protection.
“For 5 months, Ong and the deaf community waited, hoping for a fair decision from the system. But the outcome left many feeling ignored, disrespected, and let down by those who should be delivering justice.”
They protested, saying that the lenient sentence sends a message that violence (even by those in authority) is somehow okay, a stance DAWN is completely against and won’t stand for.
“An extraordinarily light punishment”
DAWN highlighted how the secrecy surrounding the case, including keeping the assailant’s identity hidden, brings up concerns about how fairly it’s being handled.
“Why is the attacker’s identity protected? Why was the case closed so quickly? This lack of transparency makes people worry that certain individuals might be avoiding accountability because of who they are.”
They’re also pushing for authorities to take another look at the case, calling for open proceedings and spaces where victims and their communities feel heard and respected.
“Justice should be visible. We’re calling for stronger accountability, real protections, and fair treatment for everyone, especially those in vulnerable communities.”
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments!
